Quill is a financial services business with a team of passionate professionals who are committed to working with family businesses, working families and retired families.
Title Searches
Title searches are now an annual requirement for the SMSF Auditors to be satisfied that:
From 1 July 2025, the SMSF Auditors will be requesting a title search each year for each property held by the SMSF. The title search will need to be dated after the audit year-end. This means that for the 30 June 2025 year-end audit, a title search will need to be dated 1 July 2025 or later.
Property Valuations
Property valuations must always be recorded at market value and the ATO made a point of reminding SMSF trustees of this last year when they issued over 16,000 letters where an asset was held at the same value for several years.
For residential properties, the process is relatively simple as we will generate an automated desktop valuation through our SMSF processing software.
For commercial properties or farmland, an independent valuation must be obtained within 6 months of 30 June e.g. for the 30 June 2025 year-end audit, it would need to be dated between 1 January 2025 and 31 December 2025. For the next two years after the independent valuation was obtained, the following alternate valuation methods can be applied:
As we rapidly approach yet another end of financial year it may be timely for you to consider a little financial “housekeeping”. I have therefore listed a few important considerations depending on your own circumstances.
Firstly, for many individuals Superannuation is often an important consideration at this time of year. So, let’s look at some of the important issues remembering that this may not be relevant to your personal circumstances and so very important that you talk to your adviser or obtain personal advice relevant to you.
Whenever we think about financial housekeeping, the other things that come to mind are investment, insurance, and estate planning.
On behalf of the Quill team, I would like to thank you for your continued support during a financial year that was more challenging than most and which not only created some challenges for our clients but also our team. Let’s hope that next financial year sees a continued improvement on the economic front as well as an improvement in freedom of travel.
The information contained in this article is provided by Quill Group Financial Services in good faith and provides factual information and general advice only. No direct or implied recommendations are given in the material. It has been provided without taking into account your investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs. Before making a decision on the basis of any information contained in this article you need to consider whether it is relevant in your particular circumstances.
This article on the Total Superannuation Balance Cap (TSB Cap) and Transfer Balance Cap (TBC) from John Maroney, CEO of the SMSF Association was originally published by the Sydney Morning Herald on 8 September 2020 under the title “Cap complexities make life difficult for SMSF trustees“.
A new law giving more than 800,000 additional employees superannuation choice has been passed by Government this week removing limitations that forced them into a super fund dictated by their employer. There is however a catch – the changes are not retrospective and will only apply for NEW agreements made after 1 January 2021.
The Treasury Laws Amendment (Your Superannuation, Your Choice) Bill 2019 passed through the Senate on Tuesday 25th August 2020. The updated Your Super, Your Choice laws remove the option of enterprise bargaining agreement deals being used to force workers into an industry superannuation fund even where they have an existing superannuation fund.
Our own Mark Beveridge wrote about this back in March 2019 for Financial Standard Super: A pay rise, but only if you give us your super to look after!
Large employers such as Coles, Woolworths and Kmart have previously entered into these types of deals, as well as many public sector employers and universities.
“You wouldn’t let your employer pick your bank, and your employer shouldn’t be able to force you into a super fund,” Assistant Minister for Superannuation Jane Hume said.
“Currently, for some workers in enterprise bargaining agreements, their super fund is chosen for them by their employer, whether they like it or not.
“This can lead to duplicate accounts, higher fees and costs to workers.”
Default funds will still exist for workers who do not make a fund choice, but workers employed on EBAs will have the right to choose their fund.
The start date was delayed to January 1, 2021, and APRA will conduct a review in two years on the impact on defined benefit schemes, such as those operated by UniSuper.
A report from the Attorney-General’s department last December found 85 current enterprise agreements locked 13,974 workers into Maritime Super, Labour Union Co-Operative Retirement Fund, Mine Super, TWU Super and WA Super, even if the workers already had a different fund.
With these changes all new employees must be provided with a the ATO standard super choice form.
In addition, any employees who were previously restricted to a specific superannuation fund due to an enterprise agreement now can choose their own super fund when their existing employer enters into a new agreement with them after 1 January 2021.
According to the explanatory memorandum any employee can choose their own super fund (including an SMSF) where they are employed under a workplace determination or enterprise agreement that is made on or after 1 July 2020 (this date was amended to 1 January 2021).
“An employer does not have to provide existing employees with a form unless requested once a new determination or agreement is made. Where there is no chosen fund for an existing employee, an employer that continues to make compulsory contributions for that employee with the same fund, in accordance with the previous determination or agreement, will comply with the choice of fund requirements,” the memorandum said.
The superannuation choice changes are not retrospective. They only apply to employees under new workplace agreements or determinations entered into after 1 January 2021. This means that even after that date, some employees will still not have superannuation choice until they come under a new agreement.
The explanatory memorandum said Treasury considered three options:
The decision was made to support option two on the basis that it “extends choice in a meaningful way while minimising compliance costs for employers.”
The Financial System Inquiry and the Productivity Commission Inquiry into superannuation found that denying superannuation choice discourages member engagement and leads to super fund members paying higher or duplicate fees across multiple funds.
“Improvements in the efficiency of contributions processing (through the adoption of SuperStream) have made the right to exercise choice of fund easier and individuals should have the right to exercise choice unless there are special factors, such as employer and member rights and obligations in regard to defined benefit funds,” said Martin Fahy chief of the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia.
If you previously have been locked into a superannuation fund with your employer under an enterprise agreement, now is the time to see advice on whether that super fund is best for you.
Quill Group has licensed financial advisers and superannuation specialists who can assist you in choosing the right superannuation fund as well as other strategies to ensure you are making the most of tax-effective contributions.
If you have any questions regarding these changes please get in touch.
The superannuation guarantee amnesty is a one-off opportunity to correct past unpaid SG amounts. Employers have a six-month window, until 7 September 2020, to disclose, lodge and pay unpaid SG amounts for their employees. Employers can claim deductions and not incur administration charges or penalties during this amnesty.
The complexities surrounding employee remuneration has become evident in recent years and calculating the appropriate level of employer superannuation contributions is no exception.
Before the amnesty period expires on 7 September 2020, employers should take the opportunity to ensure all contributions have been made, and review the payroll classification to ensure the various components of the payroll are correctly classified as “Ordinary Times Earnings” (OTE).
If incorrect classifications have been made, now is the time to confront the mistakes and make a voluntary disclosure to the ATO under the amnesty.
Some common mistakes we’ve seen include:
Under the amnesty, an employer may report any unpaid superannuation guarantee shortfall, without the imposition of the administration charge ($20 per employee per quarter), penalties, and the ability to claim a tax deduction for the shortfall.
Post the amnesty period, the penalties will be severe with a 200% penalty on top of the SGC shortfall, administration charge, and non-deductibility of the costs. The ATO has a much clearer view of non-compliant employers, with real time reporting of payroll since the introduction of Single Touch Payroll (STP).
The amnesty only covers periods between 1 July 1992 until the quarter ended 31 March 2018.
The voluntary disclosure under the amnesty is available to all employers, provided they have not been subject to an ATO investigation in respect of the unreported superannuation. Unlike other taxes, any shortfall of superannuation may extend back as far as 1 July 1992 and is not limited to the usual 4-year window.
Taking action now could save an employer significant tax costs, as well as any potential embarrassment. Remember the deadline is 7 September 2020, so we recommend acting now while there is still time.
To apply for the amnesty, you must:
Once the ATO receives your forms, they will tell you which quarters are eligible for the amnesty.
SG shortfalls for any quarter between 1 July 1992 and 31 March 2018 may be eligible for the amnesty if they haven’t been disclosed previously, or aren’t subject to a current or previous audit.
See also:
If you have any questions regarding the superannuation guarantee amnesty, please contact your Quill Relationship manager or contact us if you need assistance with your business accounting or payroll needs.
Rice Warner actuaries have recently highlighted three key areas where self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) have distinct advantages over larger APRA regulated super funds.
Half of the baby-boomer generation has already retired, and the majority did so without receiving any formal financial advice. In addition, very few have built a longevity product into their retirement portfolio to prevent them outliving their retirement savings. Most large superannuation funds still run simple account-based pensions where all risks are borne by members.
Well over half of all Australia’s retirement assets are held within SMSFs, as it is structured sensibly to allow retirees to manage their finances with great control whether they do so alone or in conjunction with their financial adviser.
Despite their small size compared to the behemoth industry and retail superannuation funds, SMSFs have advantages in three key areas:
The key advantage of SMSFs is that they enable pooling of family superannuation. More than 85% of these funds have been set up for couples. A couple at retirement often have at least four underlying accounts within their SMSF, being an accumulation and a pension account for each partner.
Even when retired, an accumulation account is needed to take future contributions from any ongoing part-time work, or to hold assets exceeding the $1.6m Pension Transfer Balance cap. Moving from accumulation phase to pension phase does involve some paperwork, however the pooled investments of an SMSF don’t change so there is a relatively smooth transition.
This contrasts to APRA funds where the partners may not in the same fund, and where their accounts cannot be linked due to outdated administration platforms. Further, shifting from a MySuper accumulation product into a retirement product can be tedious with cumbersome paperwork.
As APRA funds look to provide advice to their members, they are hampered by holding only a part of a member’s financial assets, so any intra-fund advice does not capture enough information to do more than recommend moving out of accumulation into pension phase.
Some APRA funds provide comprehensive financial advice, they can struggle. It was no surprise to see QSuper withdraw from providing comprehensive financial advice recently. The problem facing big superannuation funds is the cost of delivery of this service and the heavy compliance risks. These costs usually exceed any revenue from the service which means they are subsidised by other members.
Even where a full pre-retirement plan is prepared for a couple, the member is simply moved into an account-based pension, but the partner is often left in their current fund’s retirement product. One of the reasons for this is the compliance cost of comparing the partner’s fund with the member’s fund – and the embarrassment if the partners existing superannuation fund is rated better or is more cost effective. However, leaving the members in separate funds does makes it more complex to review strategies in future years.
Holding the superannuation assets of a couple within the same fund, such as an SMSF, materially improves the ability to facilitate the delivery of better financial advice through a broader range of options available.
Most APRA funds have a single diversified (balanced) fund shaped around MySuper.
Some funds have introduced lifecycle investments and/or bucketing solutions to help members to manage sequencing risk, including sudden downturns in investment markets leading into and during retirement. However, the absence of longevity products means that members still take on the risk of living beyond life expectancy (running out of money) as well as taking all investment market risks.
A balanced fund is ideal for those saving for retirement, but it is not optimum for retirement where people need several accounts for different purposes. For example, this could include one account for making regular pension payments, a diversified fund to cater for the longer-term spending needs, and a separate allocation for longevity protection.
Once again, this is easier to structure for a couple with all their pension assets held in one place. It is also easier to manage the tax situation. It is well known that moving from accumulation to pension phase is not considered to be a CGT event, so deferred tax liabilities are released on retirement. Some APRA funds now pay a pension transfer bonus to partly compensate their members, but it is not as efficient as an SMSF.
Many SMSFs also benefit heavily from franking credits and from company buy-backs. Many SMSFs have a higher after-tax than pre-tax investment return.
Like APRA funds, SMSFs may generally lack longevity protection, apart from the safety net of the Age Pension for those who spend all their retirement benefits before they die. SMSFs can offset longevity risk by incorporating annuity products into their investment strategies.
This article is an abridged version of “What APRA funds can learn from SMSFs in building a retirement solution” posted on the Rice Warner actuaries website 10 July 2020.
SMSFs are not for everybody and the information contained in this article should not be construed as personal advice.
This information does not take into account any particular person’s objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on any information, you should consider the appropriateness of this information having regard to your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. We strongly recommend you obtain financial advice specific to your situation before making any financial investment or insurance decision.
If you have any questions in relation to this article please contact us.