Happy New Financial Year from all here at Quill. Hopefully this next financial year shapes up to be a more positive and prosperous financial year than the last.
Quill Group Preface
We are all acutely aware that many businesses have had a very difficult year and in some cases will not recover. As a consequence there are lots of individuals that are either out of work or working reduced hours. This of course impacts on both their family as well as the broader community.
On a slightly more positive note we heard today that most States with the exception of Victoria will be opening up their borders in July and hopefully this will encourage more business, travel and tourism within Australia. Another positive is way in which many people have embraced the use of technology during this lock down. This has undoubtedly led to more efficient use of time within many businesses and certainly in our business most clients have welcomed the use of “zoom” or teleconferencing, particularly in cases where people were traveling extended distances to see us.
In recent months I have bought you a number of notes written by economist Shane Oliver who is head of strategy at AMP capital. Whilst we don’t have any investment in AMP capital at this time and each week receive dozens of research and strategy notes from other highly credentialed economists, I find that Shane Oliver manages to convey a message which in some cases are fairly complex, in a plain English and less complex manner which I certainly appreciate. So far the feedback I have received is very positive but please feel free to provide honest feedback on any of the material we send out. The ultimate aim is to inform and educate without trying to impress by focusing on overly complex topics.
The theme of this weeks note is “ What may happen to investment markets in the lead up to the US elections scheduled for November this year?”
This is certainly something that our investment committee has spent a great deal of time pondering in recent months. After a recent run up in markets following the significant fall in March, a fair degree of volatility has now returned, particularly to share markets. This is not unexpected as on the one hand we are facing rising unemployment, increasing debt levels and an ever increasing rise in the number of COVID-19 cases. Coupled with this we have the uncertainty of what will happen in the US election along with a US President likely to embark on further trade wars or other desperate measures to beef up his popularity in the lead up to the November poll. However, pushing back against this is a huge injection of capital by Central banks and the prospect that a vaccine for COVID could only be six to twelve months away.
The most interesting thing we have learnt from this note was the fact that shares have actually performed better under Democrat than Republican presidents. This is somewhat surprising given that Biden has stated he favours increased taxes, greater health spending and more regulation which is more than often associated with weaker economic growth.
- Peter Kirk, Relationship Manager | Executive Director
The US presidential election – implications for investors
This article was originally published on the AMP Captial Website 30 June 2020 by Dr Shane Oliver Head of Investment Strategy and Economics and Chief Economist, AMP Capital.
You can view the original article here: The US presidential election – implications for investors
- The run up to the US election on 3rd November has the potential to see increased share market volatility if it looks increasingly likely Biden will win and if Trump ramps up tensions with China (and maybe Europe) in response. However, this is likely to be short lived as there is no reason to expect a weaker economy and hence share market under a Biden presidency.
- Historically, shares have performed better under Democrat than Republican presidents.
Investor focus on the US election waned earlier this year after socialist Bernie Sanders dropped out of the Democratic primary race in favour of moderate Joe Biden. At the same time coronavirus became the main focus for markets. However, markets may soon start to pay more attention as the election is rapidly approaching, while Joe Biden is a moderate, he is proposing higher taxes and more regulation and President Trump is not having a good run. Trump’s re-election chances have fallen with a majority of surveyed Americans disapproving of his handling of the pandemic and recent civil unrest at a time when the US has plunged into its deepest recession since the 1930s. The historical record indicates incumbent presidents tend to lose when there is a recession in the two years before the election and unemployment has gone up.
Normally at this point past presidents seeking re-election have started to see an upswing in approval, but this is not evident yet for Trump. Rather, consistent with the above, according to Real Clear Politics’ average of polls Trump’s approval rating has fallen to 41.2% over the last two months, his disapproval rating is edging above its 2019 high, opinion polls have Biden leading Trump by around 9 points and Biden is ahead in all 6 “battleground states”, the ‘Predict It’ betting market, which had Trump ahead of Biden up until late May, now has Biden with a 23 point lead and also now has Democrats winning the presidency, the House and the Senate. The Democrats already have control of the House and are likely to retain that, but they need three seats to then along with the Vice President, gain a majority of the Senate. A clean sweep for the Democrats would remove the Senate as a blockage to higher taxes.
However, it would be wrong to write Trump off. Polls and betting markets were not so reliable in the 2016 election, there are still four months to go to the election & ongoing civil unrest could see him garner support as a “law and order president” as Nixon did in 1968. And Trump rates more highly on the economy than Biden and this may get a boost if the economy continues to reopen and recover. A rebound in the economy is Trump’s best hope which partly explains why he cheered on reopening from the end of April. However, the rebound in US coronavirus cases in many states in the last few weeks puts all this at risk.
Key Biden policy directions versus Trump
Taxation: Biden plans to raise the corporate tax rate to 28% (reversing half of Trump’s cut to 21%), return the top marginal tax rate to 39.6% (from 37%) and tax capital gains and dividends as ordinary income.
Infrastructure: Biden plans to spend $1.3trn over 10 years.
Climate policy: Biden aims for the US to reach net zero emissions by 2050 by raising the cost of fossil fuels & boosting the development of alternatives (possibly with a carbon tax).
Regulation: Biden is likely to end the era of deregulation.
Healthcare: Biden wants to strengthen Obamacare and limit drug prices.
Trade and foreign policy: Biden would likely de-escalate tensions with Europe and strengthen the alliance, work with international organisations like the World Trade Organisation, work to re-establish the nuclear deal with Iran and adopt a more diplomatic approach to dealing with trade & other issues with China (working with Europe and Asian allies in the process). By contrast a re-elected Trump is likely to double down on his trade war with China and possibly elsewhere including Europe.
Budget deficit: For the near term, the budget deficit is likely to remain high whoever wins, but historically they have fallen under Democrats after rising under Republicans. That said, if the economy proves slow to recover Joe Biden may be more likely to respond with large public sector spending programs aided by ongoing Fed quantitative easing in order to deal with ongoing high levels of spare capacity and unemployment.
On their own higher corporate and top marginal tax rates, increased regulation and an increased cost of carbon which will weigh on energy companies when they are already struggling are negative for the growth outlook. For example, the rise in the corporate tax rate would knock around 6% off earnings per share for S&P 500 companies. In particular, they may reverse some of the supply side boost provided by Trump. However, as with all things economic its never as simple as that.
- First, the negative impact of tax hikes and increased regulation in the short term could be more than offset by increased infrastructure spending (particularly if some of the revenue comes from those with high saving rates).
- Second once in office Biden may dampen down his planned tax hikes, particularly if the economy is still weak as is likely.
- Third, raising taxes on top earners while a negative for incentive may help reduce inequality which has been a key driver of the populist backlash of recent years and has arguably been made worse by Trump.
- Fourth, Biden’s trade and foreign policy focussed more on strengthening ties with Europe and a diplomatic approach to dealing with China may substantially reduce a source of angst and uncertainty under Trump (which is likely to intensify if he is re-elected).
- Finally, more stable and predictable policy making reliant on expert advice under Biden may provide a more certain environment for business and so result in increased business investment despite a rise in the corporate tax rate. Don’t forget that the uncertainty caused by Trump’s trade wars offset the boost to investment from his tax cuts.
So, on balance I see no reason to expect a weaker economic and share market outlook under a Biden presidency.
Likely market reaction
Firstly, despite the heightened policy uncertainty the election year is normally an okay year for US shares.
Since 1927, the election year, or year 4 in the presidential cycle, has had an average total return of 11.2% pa, which is only just below the average return for all years. Of course, this year is complicated by the coronavirus hit to growth and so may well be weak regardless of the election.
Second, the run up to the election could see increased share market volatility if Trump’s prospects look bleak for two reasons: investors may start to fret about the prospects of increased taxes and regulation under a Biden presidency, particularly if it looks like Democrats will win control of the Senate; and Trump may reason that he will have nothing to lose by seriously ramping up tensions with China (and maybe Europe) in a way that threatens the economic outlook, but with the prospect of shoring up his base and rallying Americans around the flag. However, while there may be short term jitters ahead of the election, for the reasons noted in the last section, there is no reason to expect a weaker economy and hence share market under a Biden presidency. Investors may ultimately welcome more reasoned and predictable policy making.
Third, historically US shares have done best under Democrat presidents with an average return of 14.6% pa since 1927 compared to an average return under Republican presidents of 9.8% pa. This has been evident in recent years with good average annual returns under President’s Obama (14.8% pa) and Clinton (19.1% pa) versus terrible returns under President G W Bush (-0.6% pa) but strong returns under President Trump’s first three years (16.3% pa).
However, the best average result has actually occurred when there has been a Democrat president and Republican control of the House, the Senate or both. This has seen an average return of 16.4% pa. By contrast the return has only averaged 8.9% pa when the Republicans controlled the presidency and Congress.
The run up to the US election has the potential to drive increased share market volatility if it looks increasingly likely that Biden will win and raise taxes and regulation and the risk is probably greater if President Trump decides he has nothing to lose and so ramps up tensions with China and maybe Europe. This would weigh on global and Australian shares and the Australian dollar given Australia’s exposure to China. However, this is likely to be short lived as there is no reason to expect a weaker economy and hence share market under a Biden presidency and he is likely to take a less disruptive approach to trade and foreign policy issues.